Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 07, 2011 03:51PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 9 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 07, 2011 04:07PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 9 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 07, 2011 05:18PM |
Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 1,094 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 07, 2011 08:13PM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 2,947 |
FFF Settings Calculator | Gcode post processors | Geometric Object Deposition Tool Blog |
Tantillus.org | Mini Printable Lathe | How NOT to install a Pololu driver |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 08, 2011 03:36AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 9 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 08, 2011 09:40AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 9 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 08, 2011 12:39PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 196 |
#ifndef _DELAY_H #define _DELAY_H #include #include #include "watchdog.h" #include // WAITING_DELAY is expressed in microseconds #define WAITING_DELAY 10000 // Force delay functions to be inlined. // Otherwise they will not work correctly. static inline void delay_us(uint16_t us) __attribute__((always_inline)); static inline void delay(uint32_t delay) __attribute__((always_inline)); static inline void delay_ms( uint16_t delay ) __attribute__((always_inline)); // Delay for a minimum of us microseconds. // The parameter us MUST be a compile time constant. // A compiler error will be issued in the case that // it is not. void delay_us(uint16_t us) { // The floating point calculation will // be completed during compilation, so // there is no runtime floating point // code generated. uint32_t cycles = ceil( (double)F_CPU * us / 1000000.0 ); __builtin_avr_delay_cycles(cycles); } // Delay for a minimum of us microseconds. // If the watchdog functionality is enabled // this function will reset the timer before // and after the delay (and at least once every // 65536 microseconds). // // This function is forced (see declaration above) to be inlined. // The parameter us MUST be a compile time constant. // A compiler error will be issued in the case that // it is not. void delay(uint32_t us) { wd_reset(); int i; for( i = 0; i < us/65536; i++ ) { delay_us(65535); delay_us(1); wd_reset(); } if( us%65536 ) { delay_us(us%65536); wd_reset(); } } // Delay for a minimum of ms milliseconds. // If the watchdog functionality is enabled // this function will reset the timer before // and after the delay (and at least once every // 65000 microseconds). // // This function is forced (see declaration above) to be inlined. // The parameter us MUST be a compile time constant. // A compiler error will be issued in the case that // it is not. void delay_ms( uint16_t ms ) { wd_reset(); uint16_t i; for( i = 0; i < ms/65; i++ ) { delay_us(65000); wd_reset(); } if( ms%65 ) { delay_us((ms%65536)*1000); wd_reset(); } } #endif /* _DELAY_H */
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 09, 2011 02:46AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,616 |
Quote
I'm afraid the C99 mode error is my fault. I submitted a patch that did not compiler under the Arduino compiler (I did not realize that at the time).
Teacup_Firmware/delay.h:30: undefined reference to `__builtin_avr_delay_cycles'
Generation 7 Electronics | Teacup Firmware | RepRap DIY |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 09, 2011 03:28AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,616 |
Generation 7 Electronics | Teacup Firmware | RepRap DIY |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 09, 2011 10:21PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 196 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 10, 2011 03:03AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,616 |
Generation 7 Electronics | Teacup Firmware | RepRap DIY |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 12, 2011 04:15PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 9 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 12, 2011 07:30PM |
Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 1,094 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 13, 2011 12:46AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 9 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 13, 2011 01:23AM |
Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 1,094 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 13, 2011 05:21AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 9 |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 13, 2011 03:55PM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 7,616 |
Generation 7 Electronics | Teacup Firmware | RepRap DIY |
Re: Compiling Teacup Firmware, Maybe is a stupid problem... May 19, 2011 07:53AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 9 |