Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

core xy: why not twist the belts?

Posted by enricodare 
core xy: why not twist the belts?
May 28, 2014 04:39AM
Hi,
studying the corexy are some examples where, instead of crossing the belt at different heights, some projects are simply turned.
What problems does this solution as simple as it is not common?

ex.
[www.youtube.com]


Enrico

[www.dapa3dservice.it] [www.studiodapa.it]
repstrap dApA, Ramps 1.4, MarlinKimbra / scanner 3D Cubify Sense / Formlabs Form 2
Re: core xy: why not twist the belts?
October 01, 2014 12:52AM
If you mean twisting in order to have the flat belt back go over flat pulleys, that's great except where you attempt to twist a length of belt that varies in span, e.g. between motor and carriage. The twist could end up very tight. Or if you're twisting so that the crossed belts don't collide, you would still need some vertical separation in order to prevent abrasion.

If you have a look in my "CoteXY build details" or the "after Hbot go CoreXY" thread, page 10 I think, I propose running the belt inside-out so that the majority of pulleys run on the belt back. You just need two cogged pulleys plus the motors, and there are a couple extra pulleys required. It's not tested yet though.
Re: core xy: why not twist the belts?
October 01, 2014 09:50AM
hi polyglot,

Thanks for the reply
I know your project and find it fantastic.
I am currently working on a scheme similar to the one attached.


Enrico

[www.dapa3dservice.it] [www.studiodapa.it]
repstrap dApA, Ramps 1.4, MarlinKimbra / scanner 3D Cubify Sense / Formlabs Form 2
Attachments:
open | download - xy mot.jpg (56.6 KB)
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login