0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 23, 2015 11:29PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 65 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 24, 2015 12:55AM |
Registered: 10 years ago Posts: 56 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 24, 2015 09:28AM |
Admin Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 3,096 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 24, 2015 11:00AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,011 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 24, 2015 12:05PM |
Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 13,886 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 24, 2015 12:52PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,011 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 24, 2015 01:05PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 1,450 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 24, 2015 04:19PM |
Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 13,886 |
Quote
Zavashier
Yep, 400 steps is more precise than 200, hopefully ! Viktor, note in my calculations, I did not count microstepping, because microstepping angle is precise only on the step and on the half step, intermediary steps are close but not precise. That means 400 steps and 200 with half step microstepping have the same angle precision. You're absolutely right but beyon the half step.
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 24, 2015 05:18PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,011 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 24, 2015 05:53PM |
Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 13,886 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 25, 2015 05:49PM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,011 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 25, 2015 06:17PM |
Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 13,886 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 26, 2015 04:03AM |
Registered: 9 years ago Posts: 1,011 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 26, 2015 04:17AM |
Admin Registered: 16 years ago Posts: 13,886 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. January 26, 2015 07:56PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 132 |
Re: 0.9° vs 1.8° steppers. February 14, 2015 08:25AM |
Admin Registered: 11 years ago Posts: 3,096 |